The case was brought following continued environmental and human rights abuses or risks caused by the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project, and the project’s failure to uphold key regional and international laws as well as agreements.

In November 2020, the four CSOs including Africa Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO) from Uganda, Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights (CEFROHT) from Uganda, Natural Justice (NJ) from Kenya and Centre for Strategic Litigation (CSL) from Tanzania, filed a case seeking to stop non-compliance of the EACOP project to key regional and international laws as well as agreements.

The case was filed on behalf of the millions of East Africans whose human and environmental rights have either been abused or are at stake due to the EACOP project, which alongside the Tilenga oil project, has led to the forced displacement of over 120,000 people.

It is claimed that this is affecting environmental resources that East Africans rely on for their livelihoods, health and wellbeing. The hearing on the appeal will take place in Kigali.

The case was dismissed by the First Instance Division of the EACJ in November 2023. The judges averred that the case was filed out of time, resulting in the dismissal. A month later, in December 2023, the CSOs filed their appeal on grounds that the judges at the First Instance Division erred in their ruling.

The appeal was first heard at the EACJ in Arusha, Tanzania, in November 2024. During that hearing, the Appellate Division of the EACJ rejected a request by the Tanzanian government to dismiss the appeal.

The court ordered the four CSOs to file a supplementary record of proceedings from the First Instance Division by November 29, 2024, to enable the judges to hear the case.

The applicants are therefore seeking orders from the Appellate Division of the East African Court Of Justice to set aside the ruling of the First Instance Division that dismissed the case.

They want the deferral of the cases to the First Instance Division for hearing on its merits. The activists also want the court to set aside the decision of the First Instance Division in which costs were awarded to the governments of Uganda and Tanzania as well as the Secretary General of the EAC.

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of AFIEGO, Dickens Kamugisha says they are looking forward to their case being heard.

“The Appellate Division has the opportunity to correct the mistakes of the First Instance Division by ordering that our case is heard on its merits. We remain hopeful that the court will dispense justice.” he said.

The East Africa Hub Director at Natural Justice, Elizabeth Kariuki said they are resolute in the pursuit of justice.

“As the appeal hearing approaches, we remain hopeful that the Appellate Division will consider the broader issues at stake and provide an opportunity to address the serious environmental and human rights concerns surrounding the EACOP,” she said.

“The severity of the issues surrounding the pipeline demands an immediate and comprehensive examination and we anticipate nothing less than a commitment to justice for the affected communities,” she added.

Deus Valentine Rweyemamu, the Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Strategic said in litigation notes that the case provides “a real opportunity for the East African Court of Justice to help set the standards for foreign investors.

He said that it will also empower the East African Community in ensuring that the community’s own standards on the environment as well as international commitments including the Paris Agreement are given life through this case.

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of AFIEGO, Dickens Kamugisha says they are looking forward to their case being heard.